Seeing Brave got me thinking about books I enjoyed as a girl, and I’ve felt compelled to read them again, to see how I would view them as an adult. I’m starting with a series of books that I loved, Tamora Pierce’s Song of the Lioness series.
SPOILERS!
The series begins when the protagonist, Alanna of Trebond, is 10 years old. She was born into a noble family in the Kingdom of Tortall, and like all young ladies, she is due to attend a convent school that will train her to live at court. However, she would much rather train to be a knight, then make her fortune in the world as a warrior maiden. Her twin brother, Thom, loathes the idea of knighthood, and would prefer to train as a sorceror, as both twins possess ‘the Gift’ of magic. They concoct a plan to switch places, and Alanna travels to the royal palace, in the capitol city of Corus, to pass herself off as ‘Alan’ and begin her life as a page.
Alanna faces many challenges, as the training is long and hard, and she feels continued insecurity over the potential discovery of her sex. However, she makes a solid group of friends amongst the older boys, including the Crown Prince, Jonathan, and has the support of her manservant Coram, and her history teacher, Sir Myles. She also meets the King of Thieves in the city, George, who proves to be a consistent and valuable friend, and to whom she reveals her female identity.
One of the best aspects of the book is the manner in which Alanna confronts obstacles. She’s devastated to discover she’s not a natural with a sword, so she gets up extra early to practice with Coram’s heavy sword, and her hard work pays off. Alanna has also resisted exploring her magic Gift due to fear over the extent of her powers, which prove to be significant, but she is forced to do so when Jonathan falls ill with a sorcery-induced illness that has ravaged the city and drained the magical healers of their powers.Alanna helps Jonathan escape great, magical danger at the conclusion of the first book, and in the process is revealed to be a girl. Rather than turning her in, as Alanna expects, Jonathan asks her to be his squire, as he is about to take the Ordeal of Knighthood.
Upon re-reading, I was struck by how many good male characters there are in the books. Indeed, the only other female characters that appear in the first book are Alanna’s local healer, who taught her about her magic; the Queen, who briefly appears; and George’s mother, who clues Alanna in when she gets her period and assumes she’s suffering some terrible disease. I probably read these books shortly before I got my period, so I’m sure I appreciated that they actually dealt with puberty.
Anyway, there are a lot of good male characters, who are true friends to Alanna, before and after they learn she’s a girl, who mentor her through obstacles, and who come to admire her for her perseverance and skill. It struck me that she really has two father figures: Coram, who basically raised her; and Myles, who later adopts her as his heir. A couple of good female characters appear in the fourth book.
There’s also a love triangle starting in the second book, which I guess is acceptable because these books were written well before Twilight. Both Prince Jonathan and George the King of Thieves love Alanna, and she loves them back, although she initially feels more romantically inclined toward Jonathan, and they start sleeping together shortly before she becomes a knight (nothing explicit). I’m pretty sure that the first time I read these I had a crush on Jonathan; reading them as an adult, I definitely side with George, who always remains a friend to both Alanna and Jonathan, no matter what. I think I didn’t like that George is several years older than Alanna, but that doesn’t bother me as an adult.
The second two books in the series deal with Alanna negotiating her identity as a female knight. Her friends accept her as she is; many others do not. She continues to fight for the good of Tortall, and I don’t want to give too many spoilers, so I’ll just say that she tends to rise to the occasion.
On the negative side, I think Alanna cries too much in the latter two books. I’m not saying she shouldn’t cry ever, it just loses its effectiveness that she does it so frequently. It’s a little strange. In some respects, the first book in the series is the strongest and most engaging, and I think the third book is the weakest. Jonathan becomes excessively bratty for no good reason. Alanna also has an affair with a third man, Liam, in the fourth book. I don’t understand why, because that wasn’t an obvious outcome of their meeting, and he comes across as rather self-satisfied and condescending. I mean, he calls her ‘kitten’, which irritates me, even if it doesn’t irritate Alanna.
Overall though, it was definitely fun to revisit this series, and I think I’ll read more Tamora Pierce–I know she published books after I ceased to read fantasy novels for young adults, which was when I was about 12.
Update: I wrote another post about the problematic relationship behaviors of Jonathan and George, because I do think they need to be discussed.
Full disclosure: I get a very small percentage of the sale if you use this link to buy the books on Amazon. If you’d like to buy the books, I’d be most grateful if you did it from here!
The love triangle is actually a large part of why, upon re-reading the books, I’m so learly about recommending them to teenaged girls. I can put up with the “romance is part of a happy ending” trope, especially since it’s dealt with so differently in the “Protector of the Small” quartet. My issue is that Alanna’s own agency is denied by both Jonathan and George. Sure, she eventually stands up to Jon, but look at the language used by both of them. It’s inevitable (in both cases apparently) that she’ll sleep with them. She just needs to come ’round to it. *shudder*
Oh goodness, yes. Have you read Mark Reads? The commentariat parses this issue quite thoroughly. I might write a post on it at some point, because I’m slowly rereading them, again.
Jonathan and George both do things that are Not OK. George gets stalkerish and at one point drugs her so she’ll sleep. Jonathan says some epically stupid things, and unfortunately neither one is really called out for it. I’ve read that Tamora Pierce would write things differently now if she had a do-over. (And also the age gap between Daine and Numair, which still skeezes me out.)
I first read the series when I was about nine, so I think it mostly went over my head and I didn’t consider their actions as templates for a romantic relationship (although I’ll admit to having a crush on Jon as a kid, but definitely not as an adult). So I do feel like these issues need to be discussed with kids and teens reading the book. I don’t want people thinking it’s ever okay to drug someone’s drink. It’s messed up.
I think Protector of the Small deals with romance and sexuality way more realistically and positively. Kel has an unrequited crush on an older boy that fades with time; she has a kissing-only relationship with a boy her age, and sex is discussed but doesn’t happen; the series ends with hints that she’s interested in someone, but she’s single and that’s okay. So I think it’s a better model for relationships, which is probably why the series was singled out for the literary award.
But I do dearly love Alanna, even when I’m severely disappointed in the actions of the other characters! So I would still recommend it, but with the proviso that the problematic stuff gets discussed.
The drugging I can tolerate more than the stalking, or the “nah, I’m right, you just don’t know what you want”. Although now that you point it out it is pretty creepy. And I’m with you on Daine and Numair, although less because of the age gap, and more because of the fact that he was her teacher. And he KNEW that it was inappropriate and ignored that.
I think you have a good point about it being a good series to have kids read and then discuss it with them. Another bonus is that I won’t have the problem of trying to keep up with my daughter – I’ve already read it! (I had a lot of unsupervised reading because my mom didn’t have time to read everything that I did). A lot of the issues I have with the series are common to all sword & sorcery (which she’ll read a lot of if she finds my book collection), or are worse in other books, so it’s unfair of me to be so harsh. (Stuff like the myth of redemptive violence, and the idea that every single fight can be won, you only lose if you’re unworthy). And even those get dealt with in a more healthy manner in the later books. I think I’m harsh on the series because it’s so good, but…
To be nice about it again: I like that Alanna gets given a hard time for not knowing how to change a diaper. It makes it more obvious that it’s not going and doing what boys do that’s best, it’s doing what she wants to.
Ha, I just wrote a post about Jonathan and George and I said that the drugging is the worst of it. And I do think it’s totally possible to like the books and still criticize them!
I do particularly like that healing is emphasized more than killing, right from the beginning of the books. Alanna helps and heals people a lot more than she kills, and most of the time when she kills someone there’s a lot of horror and sadness involved.
Part of it is probably because I read the books through the lens of having read a lot of S&S already. It’s a common trope that the hero is so busy working and is going to work themselves to death trying to save people, so someone drugs them for their own good. It’s not so much that it makes her being drugged ok, it’s just that it bugged me less for that reason.
Same thing with the healing being emphasized – it’s always done in the books that you need to do something to make amends for the killing, and after a while it starts to get old. I think it bothers me because it promotes the idea that as long as you follow certain rules, killing is ok. But you make a good point that at least the emotional trauma is addressed (as cheesy and pat as it is), and the fact that killing isn’t good.
*off to read the Jonathan and George post*